Kenneth Vercammen is a Middlesex County trial attorney who has published 130 articles in national and New Jersey publications on Criminal Law and litigation topics. Appointments can be scheduled at 732-572-0500. He is author of the ABA's book "Criminal Law Forms".
2053 Woodbridge Avenue - Edison, NJ 08817
http://www.njlaws.com/

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT - UNLAWFUL TAKING OF A MOTOR VEHICLE (N.J.S.A.2C:12-1b(6))Model Jury charge NJ


2C:12-1b(6)) Model Jury charge NJ
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT - UNLAWFUL TAKING
OF A MOTOR VEHICLE
(N.J.S.A.2C:12-1b(6))Model Jury charge
The defendant (Name) is charged in countwith the crime of aggravated assault.The indictment alleges:
(READ APPROPRIATE COUNT OF INDICTMENT)
The statute upon which this charge is based provides:

A person is guilty of aggravated assault if he causes bodily injury to another person while operating a motor vehicle in violation of [another statute defining the offense of unlawful taking of a motor vehicle]...

In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime the State must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1.That defendant caused bodily injury to another person;
and
2.That defendant did so while operating a motor vehicle in violation of the statute defining the unlawful taking of a motor vehicle.
Bodily injury is defined as physical pain, illness or any impairment of physical condition.[1]In order to find that the defendant caused bodily injury to (victim), you must find beyond a reasonable doubt, first, that (victim) would not have been injured but for defendants conduct, and, second, that the bodily injury was a probable consequence of the defendants conduct.[2]A probable consequence is one which is not too remote, accidental in its occurrence or too dependent on the conduct of another to have a just bearing on defendants liability or the gravity of his offense.[3]
A person violates the statute defining the unlawful taking of a motor vehicle for these purposes ifhe/she, with purpose to withhold temporarily from the owner, operates a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner or other person authorized to give consent.[4]
In conclusion, the two elements the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt are:
1.That defendant caused bodily injury to another person;
and
2.That defendant did so while operating a motor vehicle in violation of the statute defining the unlawful taking of a motor vehicle.
If you are satisfied that the State has proven both of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant guilty of aggravated assault.However, if you are not convinced that each of the elements has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant not guilty.


[1]N.J.S.A.2C:11-1a.
[2]N.J.S.A.2C:2-3e.
[3]State v. Martin, 119N.J.2 (1990).
[4]N.J.S.A.2C:20-10b.

No comments: