Kenneth Vercammen is a Middlesex County trial attorney who has published 130 articles in national and New Jersey publications on Criminal Law and litigation topics. Appointments can be scheduled at 732-572-0500. He is author of the ABA's book "Criminal Law Forms".
2053 Woodbridge Avenue - Edison, NJ 08817
http://www.njlaws.com/

Wednesday, December 30, 2015

AGGRAVATED CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONTACT 2C:14-3a model jury NJ

AGGRAVATED CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONTACT 2C:14-3a model jury NJ


AGGRAVATED CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONTACT
N.J.S.A. 2C:14-3a [2C:14-2a(2)]model jury charge
Count _______ of the indictment charges the defendant with aggravated criminal sexual contact.
[READ COUNT OF INDICTMENT]
That section of our statutes provides in pertinent part:
An actor is guilty of aggravated criminal sexual contact if he commits an act of sexual contact with a victim who is at least 13 years old but less than 16 years old and
[CHOOSE APPROPRIATE]
The actor is related to the victim by blood or affinity
to the third degree,1
1First degree - - parents and children; Second degree -- grandparents, grandchildren, brothers and sisters; Third degree - - uncles, aunts, nieces, nephews, great grandparents, great grandchildren. See generally State v. Gaines, 36 N.J. Eq. 297 (E. & A. 1882).
OR
The actor has supervisory or disciplinary power over
the victim because of his legal, professional or
occupational status,
OR
The actor is a resource family parent, guardian, or
stands in loco parentis within the household.
In order to convict defendant of this charge, the State must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1. That defendant purposely committed an act of sexual contact with another person;
OR
1. That defendant purposely committed an act of sexual contact by touching himself/herself and the touching was in the view of(name of victim)who defendant knew was present;AGGRAVATED CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONTACT N.J.S.A. 2C:14-3a [2C:14-2a(2]Page 2 of 5
2. That at the time of the sexual contact,(name of victim)was at least 13 years old but less than 16 years old;
3. That defendant is related to the victim by blood or affinity to the first, second or third degree;
OR
3. That defendant had supervisory or disciplinary power over the victim because of his/her legal, professional or occupational status;
OR
3. That defendant is a [resource family parent], [guardian] [stands in loco parentis, that is, in the place of the parents within the household].
The first element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that defendant purposely committed an act of sexual contact with(name of victim).
Sexual contact means an intentional touching by(name of victim)or by the defendant, either directly or through clothing, of(name of victims)or defendants intimate parts for the purpose of degrading or humiliating(name of victim)or sexually arousing or gratifying defendant.
Intimate parts means[CHOOSE APPROPRIATE]sexual organs, genital area, anal area, inner thigh, groin, buttock or breast of a person. Here the State alleges that defendant committed an act of sexual contact by(describe conduct alleged).
To find that defendant committed an act of criminal sexual contact, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt both that the touching was intentional and that it was done with the purpose of degrading or humiliating(name of victim)or sexually arousing or gratifying the defendant.
Intentional means purposeful. A person acts purposely with respect to the nature of his/her conduct or a result thereof if it is his/her conscious object to engage in conduct of that nature or to cause such a result. A person acts purposely with respect to the attendant circumstances if he/she is aware of the existence of such circumstances or believes or hopes that they exist.
[WHEN DEFENDANT IS CHARGED WITH TOUCHING HIMSELF/HERSELF,AGGRAVATED CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONTACT N.J.S.A. 2C:14-3a [2C:14-2a(2]Page 3 of 5The State is not required to prove that(name of victim)actually observed or witnessed the alleged sexual contact. Rather, the State must prove that the alleged sexual contact occurred in the view of(name of victim). Field of vision is not limited to the visual direction in which the alleged victim is focused upon at the particular time when the alleged sexual contact is said to have occurred. Field of vision includes the areas that(name of victim)was capable of viewing.The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that(name of victim)was present.AGGRAVATED CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONTACT N.J.S.A. 2C:14-3a [2C:14-2a(2]Page 4 of 5
The third element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that:
[CHOOSE APPROPRIATE]
Defendant is related to the victim by blood or affinity to the first, second or third degree. Here, the State alleges that defendant is related to(name of victim)by(type of relationship).
OR
Defendant had supervisory or disciplinary power over the victim because of his/her legal, professional or occupational status. In this case, the State alleges that defendant had [supervisory] [disciplinary] power over(name of victim)because of defendants status as(insert allegation). In determining whether defendant had [supervisory] [disciplinary] power over(name of victim), you must examine the entire context of the relationship between the defendant and(name of victim). To do so, you should consider the nature of the relationship between the defendant and the victim and whether the relationship was so unequal as to vest [supervisory] [disciplinary] power in the defendant. Among the factors you may consider are whether there was a significant disparity in ages and/or maturity level between the defendant and victim, whether the defendant offered advice and guidance to the(name of victim)on questions and issues outside the defendants role as __________ and the power or ability of the defendant to affect the(name of victim)future participation or success.5
5These factors are suggested by State v. Buscham, 360 N.J. Super. 346, 362 (App. Div. 2003), where the issue was defendants role as a coach. The parties should identify factors in their own particular case which would be significant for the jury to consider in determining whether the defendant had supervisory or disciplinary power over the victim.
6N.J.S.A. 30:4C-26.4.
OR
Defendant is a [resource family parent], [guardian] [stands in loco parentis within the household] of(name of victim). Resource family parent means any person other than a natural or adoptive parent with whom a child in the care, custody or guardianship of the Department of Children and Families is placed by the department, or with its approval, for care, and shall include any person with whom a child is placed by the Division of Youth and Family Services for the purpose of adoption until the adoption is finalized.6
An in loco parentis relationship occurs when a person acts as a temporary guardian orAGGRAVATED CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONTACT N.J.S.A. 2C:14-3a [2C:14-2a(2]Page 5 of 5

No comments: